White penises are larger than Asian ones, Fact or Fiction?
Let’s analyze how this (mis)perception came (oops) into play. White guys probably like looking at penises a lot, and noticed from the changing rooms, and porn, that black penii are significantly larger, but that asian penii are significantly smaller than their own pale peckers. There is a very human reaction to being shat upon from up on high, shit upon the one lower than you. Typically human reaction.
Segue into the era of statistics, and scientific studies. Caucasians are now using these rather dubious methods of investigation to proclaim the fact, yes , asian penii are smaller than white ones, while conveniently ignoring the african population.
We should also do an expository on genetics. There is a phenomenon called “genetic drift”. The frequency of any given allele in a population will undergo a variation in its frequency. In other words, the “large penis” gene ( if there is one ) can go from a 5% occurrence within any population ( ie, whites, asians,,blacks) all the way to 100% ( lucky bastards ! ). This effect tends to occur in smaller populations, while it is “diluted out” in large populations.
The asian population in Asia is 2.1 billion , whereas the caucasian population in Europe and North America is is 0.7 billion. Therefore , the effect of genetic drift is more amongst caucasians in Europe and North America, the two regions most often measured in the penile length studies. Therefore, the white population of the US and europe ( ex Brexit ? ) has a higher chance of genetic drift, ie, of having a higher frequency the large penis gene, and thus, large penii, whereas the asians in asia have less genetic drift , and are stuck with their original size penii.
Let’s look at another factor affecting “penis size”…or actually, perception of penis size: statistics. Statistics are used to back up scientific claims, such as the pseudo-science of the large white johnson. This pseudo science is published in less than reputable scientific journals, using incorrectly deployed statistics, but are trumpeted by the mass media, and by definition, the internet, and Google search engines. ie. junk science published in the Journal of Irreproducible Urologic Science ( Hebernick et al ) gets trumpeted in the the Huff post, the London Daily Mail, Men’s Health, and various Penile length enhancement websites, all using the erroneous science for their own nefarious ends…ie, sell more magazines and papers, and suction dievces. I think we were taught this was “yellow journalism” in the Spanish American war in the 1800s, in which newspapers invented a fictional story of Spanish aggression , a journalistic act that precipitated a war..
a Bell Curve, a Gaussian distruibution.:
Look at the curves for caucasian penis size , and look at the distribution, it is not a perfectly symmetric Bell curve. It tapers more gradually on the right end, the end that represents large penis size. The effect is to make the mean larger than the median. In other words, it pulls up the average, unfairly. Now look at the distribution Bell curve for asian dick size: it is perfectly symmetric, a true Bell curve . Her, the mean, the average cock length is NOT pulled up by a few outliers with Mondo Dongs. If you’re going to compare average dick length, that number should have been derived from a perfect Bell Curve, not a skewed one. Or you could compare two skewed bell curves.
So you may ask, why is the caucasian bell curve skewed to the right? Who are these genetically lucky outliers? The answer is provided by the genome identifying company, 23 and me. In it, it was found that Caucasians in the US and Europe have a 2% incidence of African genes. The asian percentage of african genes is vanishingly ( oops again) small. This 2% incidence of African genes in white folk . Do the math, and it is enough to account for the skew in the Bell curve ! There has been a long history of rape by white slavemasters, and these offspring are those with enough white characteristics to look phenotypically white, until they drop their drawers to reveal their african Mondo dong. Asians do not have any history of enslaving black people, and thus, do not have the resultant right-skew in the Bell curve. So when Caucasians crow about having a (slightly) longer dong than their asian counterparts, they are merely alluding to their awful and inhumane history of enslavement of the African peoples. Perhaps not something to be proud of.